<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hills and Heights &#187; Manchester on the James</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hillsandheights.org/tag/manchester-on-the-james/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hillsandheights.org</link>
	<description>Breaking News, local events, and community gardens from Forest Hill to Woodlands Heights in Richmond, Virginia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:19:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Manchester on the James Property Sold &#8211; More Apartments on the Way?</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2011/07/25/manchester-on-the-james-property-sold-more-apartments-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2011/07/25/manchester-on-the-james-property-sold-more-apartments-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard.H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Manchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.org/?p=12896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Richmond BizSense.com it looks like apartments are again destined for a 2.25-acre site on Cowardin Avenue, on the south side of the Lee Bridge. North Carolina-based Ravin Partners LLC purchased the property for $1 million from City View LLC. The property carries with it a special use permit from 2008, allowing the owner [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2011/07/25/manchester-on-the-james-property-sold-more-apartments-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition to Manchester on the James in RTD</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2010/01/18/opposition-to-manchester-on-the-james-in-rtd/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2010/01/18/opposition-to-manchester-on-the-james-in-rtd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard.H</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.org/?p=5345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was discussed here when the vote was going down last week and now the RTD is covering the debate as well. Council members Kathy C. Graziano and Ellen F. Robertson supported Crosland&#8217;s request for $4.5 million in bonds even though they had voted against its special-use permit. They said they wouldn&#8217;t undermine a project [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2010/01/18/opposition-to-manchester-on-the-james-in-rtd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Springhill on the Crosland Development</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/06/04/springhill-on-the-crosland-development/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/06/04/springhill-on-the-crosland-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.net/news/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Greg Johnson of the Springhill neighborhood: Dear Richmond Neighbors, We in the Old and Historic Neighborhood of Springhill request your assistance in opposition to the Manchester on the James development project. The property owner, Floyd â€œPatâ€ Patterson, is attempting to get a Special Use Permit to allow Charlotte, North Carolina developer Crosland, to build [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/06/04/springhill-on-the-crosland-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still more on &#8220;The Development&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/05/26/still-more-on-the-development/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/05/26/still-more-on-the-development/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 18:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodland Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.net/news/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The T-D asks if the Springhill/Semmes development is a &#8220;good fit or sore thumb.&#8221; Unsurprisingly, the line seems to be pretty much split between residents on one side and city officials &#038; developers on the other.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/05/26/still-more-on-the-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Development closer to approval</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/05/21/development-approved/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/05/21/development-approved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodland Heights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.net/news/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overshadowed by the recent furor over, um, other things, City Council gave a tentative nod to the much-debated Cowardin/Semmes development (referred to as City View Towers, Manchester on the James, among others). The SUP vote will go before council as a whole at its June 9 session, a meeting which will doubtless see a sizable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/05/21/development-approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Springhill Development to go back before council</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/03/03/springhill-development-to-go-back-before-council/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/03/03/springhill-development-to-go-back-before-council/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City View Towers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.net/news/2008/03/03/springhill-development-to-go-back-before-council/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday March 24, City Council will consider the amended Special Use Permit for the controversial Springhill development that has gone by various names (Manchester on the James, City View Towers, etc). The Springhill Neighborhood would love to see a full house that evening, and encourage all with concerns about increased rentals and traffic to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/03/03/springhill-development-to-go-back-before-council/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Council to hear development SUP</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/01/28/council-to-hear-development-sup/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/01/28/council-to-hear-development-sup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.net/news/2008/01/28/council-to-hear-development-sup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was mentioned by Ben in a comment to another post, but I thought it was worth bringing up to the front: The amendment to the SUP (Special Use Permit) will be voted on by City Council on Monday at 6pm. The developer has fundamentally changed the nature of the project (footprint, building height, size [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/01/28/council-to-hear-development-sup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Condo project changeup</title>
		<link>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/01/12/condo-project-changeup/</link>
		<comments>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/01/12/condo-project-changeup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Springhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manchester on the James]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillsandheights.net/news/2008/01/12/condo-project-changeup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We wrote back in November about the condo project intended for the foot of the Lee Bridge, specifically that the inaccurately named Manchester on the James had shrunk from a 17-story high rise to 4 stories. Today&#8217;s T-D takes a further look at the project and residents&#8217; concerns. Some residents in the South Richmond neighborhood [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://hillsandheights.org/2008/01/12/condo-project-changeup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/39 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 412/492 objects using disk: basic

Served from: hillsandheights.org @ 2012-02-08 12:13:41 -->
